Kevin Coogan

  • About
  • Blog
  • Election 2016 Analysis
  • Election Forecasts — OCT
  • Election Forecasts — NOV
  • Presentations and Research
  • Videos
  • zettacap
  • 
  • 
  • 
wordpress stat

Copyright © 2026 · Sixteen Nine Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

You are here: Home / Big Data / SMI and Brazil’s Election: early 2017 to mid-2017

SMI and Brazil’s Election: early 2017 to mid-2017

August 2, 2018 by Kevin Coogan

(Excerpt from a previously published report on using social media to forecast the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Election, Analyzing the 2018 Brazilian Election Social Media Influence Index, July 2018)

SMI and Brazil’s Election – early 2017 to mid-2017

In July 2017, SMI forecasted two candidates as standing out of the fairly large pool of potential candidates.  The first was Bolsonaro who has gained considerably in polls since that time and is now considered a leading candidate by various measures.  The second was Joao Doria, the former mayor of Sao Paulo and former host of the Brazilian version of The Apprentice.

At the time, it appeared that the first round of voting would produce Bolsonaro and Doria as the winners, forcing a second round of voting.  Whereas Bolsonaro has aggressively worked during the past year to organize his presidential run, Doria appears to have acquiesced to his larger party’s internal politics and has decided to run for Governor of Sao Paulo instead of for president, leaving Alckmin clear for his second attempt at the presidency.  SMI, however, clearly identified Doria as a superior candidate in comparison to Alckmin, both then and now.

Interestingly, at that time, Lula showed very little social media traction.  In early 2017, it was actually rather shocking to see how SMI depicted Lula as being a mediocre candidate – and this was before indictments.  At that time, most assumed he would be able to run again for president and that, given his strong poll numbers, would win.  His SMI, however, showed a different story in that his message was not resonating or gaining attention.  Lula simply did not look like a strong candidate according to SMI.

Additionally, SMI showed weakness for the other mainstream potential candidates who had previously run for president.  Marina Silva, Gomes, and Alckmin all produced rather meager SMI during early 2017 even though they had significant name recognition and showed signs of running.  According to SMI, from the very start of this election cycle, Brazilians have tended to focus on fresh faces (Bolsonaro and Doria) and shunned establishment candidates.

 

Filed Under: Big Data, Election, Forecasts, Polls, Social Desirability Bias, Social Media Analysis, Social Media Influence Tagged With: Alckmin, Bolsonaro, Ciro Gomes, Doria, Lula, Marina Silva

Kevin Coogan is the founder of zettacap and amalgamood, and is a former hedge fund manager. www.linkedin.com/in/kjcoogan

Featured Posts

Who Won the First Democratic Debate (Night 2)?

Who Won the First Democratic Debate (Night 1)?

Michelle Obama as Reluctant Savior

2020 Democrats: Low Probability Candidates and a Reluctant Savior

Overview 2020 Democratic Race using SMI_January 2019

SMI of 2020 Democrats / ST Observations

US Midterms — SMI Trends

US Midterms — Summary of Forecasts

US Midterms — Republicans take a late lead

Bolsonaro to Win Brazil’s Presidency